Major updates to Mac Pro and Macbook/Air/Pro lineups imminent

As Rumors has previously reported, a new generation of 32-nanometer Intel chips (Arrandale for mobile, Gulftown/Westmere-EP on the desktop) are ready for Apple to build several new Macs around. Several factors have kept Apple from being the first to adopt these chips, but sources now report that the time for their announcement is approaching.

Some widely published reports about the 2010 Mac Pro were based on information deliberately falsified by a single source, but other than the specific date given, much of the information that has been reported is essentially accurate: a new lineup of Mac Pros with a high-end 12-core (dual sockets, 6 physical/12 logical cores per chip) model have been under development in Cupertino for some time and are now close to being ready to ship. The 12-core model will be extremely expensive, and few workloads will fully utilize anywhere near that many CPU cores; in fact, many users rarely need more than 4 physical/8 logical cores such as on the Core i7 iMac. The high end of the Mac Pro family will continue to evolve, but expect to see some of the most important changes happening at the entry level rather than the high end.

As for the Macbook, Macbook Air and Macbook Pro, the Intel “Arrandale” chip family (Mobile Core i3, i5, i7) has been available for some time but Apple has delayed the announcement of products based on them for a number of reasons. These reasons are now largely outdated or have been addressed — such as a large supply of existing Core 2 based models which has now dwindled to near-critically low levels — and although even Cupertino hasn’t set a fixed announcement date yet, it is reported to now be less (likely much less) than a month away.

We will be posting more detailed analysis of each product lineup in the coming days, but here is a quick summary of the systems we anticipate seeing in the near future, based on recent reports of prototypes. Not all of these configurations will necessarily become shipping products:

Mac Pro

  • Most models move up to Xeon 5600 family, though some variants may use other Xeon chips. There has been much discussion of non-Xeon chips, which will be addressed in an upcoming article on the Mac Pro, but little reason to expect such a move based on the best evidence available to us.
  • Quad-core (single socket) based on Bloomfield or Lynnfield Xeon chips using existing 45nm technology, to reduce entry-level pricing. 1-3 configurations all costing less than current equivalent quads.
  • Six-core (single socket) Gulftown system as a new mid-range option. Comparable to existing quad core pricing or slightly higher.
  • Eight-core (dual socket) based on Westmere-EP, substantial performance gains over existing octo-core systems
  • 12-core (dual socket) based on Westmere-EP. 1-2 configurations.
  • All configs will support 2 or 3 channels of DDR3-1333 memory, a substantial gain over 1066MHz memory used in existing systems.
  • New AMD (ATi) 5000-series and nVIDIA 400-series graphics cards. The AMD Radeon 5870 is a leading contender due its superior price-performance attributes and leading benchmark numbers.

Macbook

  • Core 2 based model similar to existing one, but with a few changes to possibly include faster CPU clock speed. Arrandale (Core i3) prototypes are in development but there is reason to believe that these will not ship until later in the year.

Macbook Air

  • Low-voltage Arrandale processors with two physical and four logical cores via HyperThreading. “Official” clock speeds may be substantially lower than current Core 2 systems, but have very aggressive Turbo allowing them to nearly double those clock speeds when operating temperatures/power dissipation are low and/or only one core is in use. Overall performance should be considerably improved over Core 2.
  • Integrated Arrandale graphics core with performance similar to or better than the current nVIDIA 9400M GPU.
  • Battery life improvements
  • Some prototypes retain the current 13-inch 16:10 display, but most have 16:9 widescreen displays.
  • New, improved SSD storage options.

Macbook Pro

  • All models almost certainly based on new Arrandale CPU/GPU chip (see below), with high-end models adding discrete graphics processors by AMD up to and including the mobile 5870 which is considerably faster than the nVIDIA 9600M-GT in the current lineup. Arrandale’s on-package GPU chip is clocked differently in different chip models, so performance varies but should never be less than the current nVIDIA 9400M.
  • Co-developed with AMD and Intel, Apple will employ a new software technology that intelligently switches between the Integrated (Arrandale) and Discrete (AMD) graphics processors in systems which have both. This will save power, and in some cases, allow both GPUs to be used together for a substantial performance boost.
  • All three models (currently 13, 15 and 17 inches) will be revamped with slightly modified enclosures that sport wider 16:9 displays. The change in shape has several advantages including making more room for bigger batteries and improving cooling characteristics which will allow for faster CPUs and GPUs. No major changes in overall display size expected, despite some prototypes with 12 and 14 inch panels.
  • A quad-core “Clarksfield” CPU has been seen in prototypes, but there are many reasons to doubt its suitability for a production system. In our opinion, the odds are against it; we will examine this further in an upcoming MBP-specific article.
  • New, improved SSD storage options.

Given that Apple itself is still waiting on the results of initial production test-runs of these machines by its overseas manufacturing partners (avoiding a repeat of issues seen in early 27-inch iMacs is something the company considers vitally important) and other key “milestones” which must be verified before announcement/shipping dates can be set, Rumors is not quite ready to begin making predictions for those dates; but with the possible exception of the Macbook or Mac Pro, expect them within days or weeks, not months. More specific predictions will have to wait until Apple itself has made those decisions and our sources can pass the information on to us.

Roadmap documents acquired by Rumors in mid-2009 suggest that Apple originally expected to update its laptop lineups earlier this month, and the Mac Pro in early to mid April — but there have clearly been changes to its plans since that time, as there always are when the rubber actually meets the road.

Stay tuned for much more on this and all things Apple in the days ahead — embargoes are falling like dominoes and we have much more to report on several topics very soon. In the meantime, you can always reach us to ask questions, submit comments, or dish the dirt by emailing us (rumors@macosrumors.com), following @MacOSRumors on Twitter, or simply submitting a comment using the form below.


Share this post: Share this article on Facebook Share this Article on Twitter Add this Article to Stumbleupon Add this Article to Del.icio.us Add this Article to Digg Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Newsvine
This entry was posted in Apple Hardware and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • Lu

    When you keep referring to AMD (specifically in the MacBook Pro section), such as “Co-developed with AMD and Intel, Apple will employ a new software technology that intelligently switches between the Integrated and Discrete (AMD) graphics” did you actually mean NVIDIA?? I was not aware that AMD and Intel work together, AND they developed software for auto-switching when it was NVIDIA recently who's getting the spotlight for Optimus. Can you explain this?

    Thanks

  • http://xerces.com/ dalaixerces

    AMD = ATi. Apple has its own solution for the integrated/discrete switching on existing Macbook Pro models, but it's not dynamic and the two can't be used in a pseudo-SLI arrangement (allowing both GPUs to work together). Since the new Arrandale chips come with their own on-package integrated GPUs, and the Nehalem architecture (of which Arrandale is a part) eliminates the need for — or even possibility of — an nVIDIA motherboard chipset, Apple has been working with Intel and AMD/ATi on a superior solution for the new Arrandale based laptops.

    That's not to say that it isn't possible that there will be discrete nVIDIA graphics in some models, but because the solution that Apple's been working on is unique to the combination of integrated Arrandale and discrete AMD/ATi GPUs, we think the latter is far more likely.

    Intel and AMD aren't exactly working directly together on this; they're both collaborating with Apple on Apple's own solution.

    It doesn't work quite the same way nVIDIA's Optimus does, but there are a lot of similarities.

  • eric_harris

    The 13″ MacBook Pro had better come standard with 4GB RAM and a real hard drive.

  • Metalizer

    re. macbooks and MBPs, where does this
    leave the nVidia MCP89 and MCP99 chipsets
    that were widely reported as being utilised
    for the 2010 models?

  • scottsdaleone

    The MBA uses an SL9x00 series low voltage CPU. Intel's replacement CPU for the SL9x00 CPU is the Core i7-6x0LM CPU. The CPUs you're implying for the MBA are ULTRA low voltage CPUs. Now, are you saying that Apple is going from a Low Voltage C2D to an Ultra Low Voltage Arrandale?

    With regard to the Intel GMA IGP, how exactly will Apple market itself going backwards from an Nvidia 9400m to Intel's worthless GMA IGP? In addition, OS X is not going to do as well as Windows for HD video playback and play Flash in browsers. Remember with the original MBA's Intel 3100 graphics, the MBA couldn't even play standard definition video and Flash led to overheating, core shutdowns, lock ups, and more spinning beach balls from hell.

    Even if Apple used the Intel GMA IGP in the MBA, how in the hell does Apple sell such a poor performing graphics system in its other Mac products? Right now every Mac except the Mac Pro uses the Nvidia 9400m. I personally would rather use the exact same SL9x00 C2D Penryn CPU WITH 9400m in my MBA than an Arrandale CPU with only its own GMA IGP. I believe “Pro” users, iMac users, Mac mini users and even MB users will be pretty upset going backwards from Nvidia's sixteen month old 9400m GPU to an Intel IGP that isn't going to be equivalent to an Nvidia 9400m even in the most heavily skewed reports. In addition, Apple spent a lot of money telling people they were getting 5X the graphics performance by choosing Nvidia. They furthered the Nvidia campaign by writing OpenCL into their new OS X version Snow Leopard. It just doesn't seem feasible or responsible for Apple to go so far backwards with its graphics technologies. I believe most people would be better off with another C2D and Nvidia GPU Mac update!

    I sure hope Apple isn't considering only including Intel's GMA IGP in any new Mac offering. I want a hybrid solution, but I would accept an Nvidia dedicated GPU or integrated chipset/GPU with C2D. I will NOT ACCEPT any new Macs that solely use Intel's GMA IGP for their graphics. Furthermore, I would bet money that not a single scientific test will prove that the Intel IGP isn't even equivalent to the sixteen month old Nvidia GPU… in the real world, we need to be improving our graphics performance every year. Right now, Nvidia Optimus with a 310m in the low-end MBPs, MBA, MB, and Mac mini seem far more likely. In the MBPs and iMacs, a 330 GT along with Optimus sounds like a much more likely solution.

    Where is this ATI info coming from anyways? I thought Apple tried ATI solutions but Jobs decided not to give them their business, and Optimus was working better for battery life anyways. I would think that the ATI cards would be a better dedicated solution, but with battery life being incredibly important to Apple, it just seems Optimus is going to be the technology used. In addition, I believe that Nvidia was trying to let Apple introduce the Optimus technology but Apple delayed the Mac notebook updates too far back.

    Interesting to read something so completely different…

  • Ryan Brown

    So when this doesn’t happen on Tuesday will they take this article down?

  • http://xerces.com/ dalaixerces

    We have heard of prototypes with nVIDIA “Optimus” chipsets, and an internal debate between using Intel or nVIDIA chipsets for Arrandale may be partly responsible (along with chip shortages) for the delay in introducing new laptops, but reportedly there are concerns in Cupertino over legal liability if nVIDIA chipsets were used.

    Intel has not authorized any third party to make chipsets compatible with its “Nehalem” class (of which Arrandale are a part) CPUs, and nVIDIA's chipsets for these CPUs — which all have their own on-chip/on-package memory controllers thereby making the design of a full chipset a very different proposition than with Core 2 or previous chips — are on shaky legal ground.

    We would not be utterly shocked to see one or more new laptops with nVIDIA chipsets (other than Core 2 based designs such as the new Macbook we described), but it would definitely come as a surprise given these issues. Apple still has some preference for nVIDIA as a chipset partner, but as we have seen with Nehalem-class (Lynnfield quad i5 and i7) 27in iMacs, the company has chosen Intel chipsets and we expect to see the same with the Macbook Pro/Air.

  • http://xerces.com/ dalaixerces

    You ask a number of complex questions, but here are the short answers….we may be able to give a bit more detail in some areas in the full articles on laptops coming up this week.

    We intentionally hedged with regard to the Macbook Air, because we've heard of prototypes with both the Low and Ultra-Low Voltage Arrandale variants. Although the ULV/ULM version performs fairly well as a CPU, it has a very low clocked integrated GPU and from what we've been told, the “regular” Low-Voltage variant has acceptable thermal characteristics for this purpose. We do not yet have confirmation as to which will be the final specification but we're paying close attention to that and hope to be able to get un-embargoed confirmation soon.

    Apple has been on good terms with nVIDIA in the past couple of years, but given the legal complexities of using Optimus with Arrandale, or any third party chipset with Nehalem-class CPUs (other companies find it acceptable, but Infinite Loop has a low tolerance for these types of risks)….Cupertino has been exploring other alternatives and seems pleased with the solution that we've described.

    As I said in response to another comment about this, we would not be entirely shocked at Apple choosing an nVIDIA chipset to go with Arrandale CPUs, but there are several fairly compelling arguments for using Intel's chipsets and ATi's newest 5000-class discrete GPUs. Notably, the cost of an all-Intel solution for integrated-only models is lower, allowing Apple to introduce new entry level models with better price/performance (even if in some cases, they do perform slightly lower than the 9400M; the wide range of GPU clocks in various Arrandale chips make it possible for Apple to avoid that if they wish). And the new Mobility 5xxx chips from AMD/ATi are very competitive with nVIDIA's offerings.

    nVIDIA doesn't currently have a solution for coordinating Arrandale IGPs with their own discrete chips, something that AMD/ATi has been working on quite aggressively and Apple has partnered with them on. Given the substantial effort that Infinite Loop has put into that project, we are fairly convinced that this will be used in the new laptops.

    Getting into details this specific is asking to be proved wrong in the rumor-mongering business, but we have a few additional reasons to believe in this scenario which are still embargoed. Hopefully we'll be able to talk about them more soon….and one way or another, we shouldn't have too much longer to wait in order to find out the final shipping specs.

  • http://xerces.com/ dalaixerces

    Your question is a bit confusing; do you mean us (we didn't publish the deliberately faked report you're referring to: we never predicted that the new laptops would ship on that date as some others did), or other sites?

  • scottsdaleone

    Thanks for the reply. I understand this to be what you know is going on, but I sure hope to heck Apple changes its mind and doesn't “stick us” with Intel's GMA IGP as our sole graphics solution in a single Mac offering. I find Intel's graphics to be disgustingly inferior, and Nvidia is my preference. I especially like Optimus. My understanding was that Intel blocked Nvidia from using the Nvidia chipset for use with Arrandale-class CPUs. I didn't understand that Apple couldn't use an Intel chipset, and use the GMA IGP in hybrid mode with Optimus software and a dedicated Nvidia solution. I agree it would seem that if Apple wanted to do that it would have negotiated the deal and guaranteed its own revealing of the tech. I just hope there's an ATI card and hybrid system that will work well, use the ATI card for intensive tasks, OpenCL, and use only the GMA IGP when trying to save battery and not needing graphics performance.

    In the end, I will be happy with a MacBook Air that improves on my current v 2,1 MBA. If it has an ultra low voltage CPU, I will be disappointed unless it performs better than my current 2.13 GHz CPU. If the graphics is solely Intel's GMA IGP, I seriously fear it will be junk and worthless and a gigantic step backwards. We have seen graphics hardware rated and compared with prior hardware before and they always use Windows as the OS for testing. I find that Windows is not a fair measure for the Mac as Windows runs HD video, Flash, and etc better than OS X. So I sure hope my MBA has either an ATI or an Nvidia solution of some sort. I don't care if it's something that's only 10% better than the current 9400m, but I don't want it to be worse. My original MBA with Intel GMA graphics was a POS. It overheated by running a few Flash tabs of Safari. It couldn't play simple videos (not even HD), and it froze and locked up anytime trying to do nearly anything “normal.” It was the first Mac I ever owned that was a piece of crap and didn't “just work” in any way. Therefore, I really don't want to see Intel graphics… so I hope Apple sees the light and remembers how much money it spent marketing us Nvidia solutions at 5x the performance of Intel's GMA.

    I know it's all a lot of rumors and speculation, and I definitely appreciate the fact that you guys have some inside info and you're willing to share it. Thanks again for replying.

    Long live the Mac!