Twitter Feed
- @Masque Those posts were made by one team member; inactivity of others is what made it stand out. Again, we receive no compensation for that 2010/03/06
- @Masque FYI, do *not* advertise in our Twitter feed. We post such things because we think they are of interest, not because we're paid to. 2010/03/06
- The Mac Sale 3-Over $500 worth of apps for $47.49! http://bit.ly/CYMt5 (via @maczot) 2010/03/05
- So we thought we'd make a sweet bundle even MORE amazing. Check out the 3 new apps we added! http://macheist.com/tweetblast (via @MacHeist) 2010/03/05
- According to the #MacHeist site, they have raised over $74,000 for charity so far - http://www.macheist.com/ 2010/03/03
Recently Popular
- MacHeist 2010 nanoBundle is now live....
- Apple reportedly in talks with Verizon, Sprint over 2010 iPhones & 4G
- What's next for iMac and Mac Pro?
- Latest Mac OS X 10.6.3 beta suggests release imminent
- Will Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" really support PowerPC?!
- Next for Apple: Mac Pros and Xserves based on Intel Core i7
- Apple quietly adds 3.33GHz quad-core Mac Pro to keep up with iMac, but fails to match value
- iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th Apple Event
- iTunes 9 still not 64-bit, internally referred to as "iTunes X"
- Apple pulls "sexy" apps from app store
Featured Stories
Categories
- 3rd Party Software (12)
- App Store (7)
- Apple Events (26)
- Apple Hardware (65)
- Apple Inc. (21)
- Apple Software (76)
- Articles (8)
- Site News (1)
- Uncategorized (4)







BREAKING NEWS: 3-Alarm fire damages Apple HQ in Cupertino
A considerable portion of the building not directly affected by the fire or even the billowing smoke was then ravaged, as far the technology is concerned as well as the furnishings and even many of the outer-layer construction materials in the West Wing of Building 6 will almost certainly be completely destroyed by the water damage caused by sprinklers and require near 100% replacement.
Already there has been some suggestion of demolishing the 40+ year old two-story building, or at least part of it, and adding on a considerably larger & superior structure with a fairly similar ground footprint to the existing structures of Building 6 or at least its western wing…..thereby avoiding the worst of the regulatory & permit-related complications involved in such a renovation.
Since the damage done will almost certainly require extensive renovations anyway for the foreseeable future and the near total abandonment of a substantial portion of Building 6….
Talk began almost immediately — once it was confirmed that no one had been physically harmed — in regards to it being better and wiser to start over than to try to repair things piecemeal within a still-standing structure but one which will be compromised in a number of challenging ways.
Related Posts: