Twitter Feed
- @Masque Those posts were made by one team member; inactivity of others is what made it stand out. Again, we receive no compensation for that 2010/03/06
- @Masque FYI, do *not* advertise in our Twitter feed. We post such things because we think they are of interest, not because we're paid to. 2010/03/06
- The Mac Sale 3-Over $500 worth of apps for $47.49! http://bit.ly/CYMt5 (via @maczot) 2010/03/05
- So we thought we'd make a sweet bundle even MORE amazing. Check out the 3 new apps we added! http://macheist.com/tweetblast (via @MacHeist) 2010/03/05
- According to the #MacHeist site, they have raised over $74,000 for charity so far - http://www.macheist.com/ 2010/03/03
Recently Popular
- MacHeist 2010 nanoBundle is now live....
- Apple reportedly in talks with Verizon, Sprint over 2010 iPhones & 4G
- What's next for iMac and Mac Pro?
- Latest Mac OS X 10.6.3 beta suggests release imminent
- Will Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" really support PowerPC?!
- Next for Apple: Mac Pros and Xserves based on Intel Core i7
- Apple quietly adds 3.33GHz quad-core Mac Pro to keep up with iMac, but fails to match value
- iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th Apple Event
- iTunes 9 still not 64-bit, internally referred to as "iTunes X"
- Apple pulls "sexy" apps from app store
Featured Stories
Categories
- 3rd Party Software (12)
- App Store (7)
- Apple Events (26)
- Apple Hardware (65)
- Apple Inc. (21)
- Apple Software (76)
- Articles (8)
- Site News (1)
- Uncategorized (4)







Is Apple planning a desktop version of “Macbook Air”? A “Mac Air”?!
Sporting special low-voltage, 45-nanometer Core 2 Duo mobile processors from the “Penryn” family of Intel mobile CPUs, the “Mac Air” would most likely have two versions, one running at 1.8GHz and another at 2.16GHz. 2GB of onboard RAM (two banks of 1GB DDR2-667 SO-DIMM memory) would be included, and would not be upgradable or removable — just like the Macbook Air.
Although the new speculative aspects of Apple’s 2008 roadmap we are seeing emerge on the grapevine, including this new mid-level desktop and a dramatically overhauled Mac Mini, don’t exactly dovetail very well with previous, more well-confirmed information like our “spy shot” session with the prototype “Mac Nano” chassis late last year…..and there are any number of questions about how the market would respond to a desktop that has many of the compromises that make the Air so controversial and so unique.
Nonetheless, a lot of people seem very excited by the idea of a new, stripped-down Mac; not only would it help drive the Mini further down to the very lowest practical price ranges, it would address a market segment who likes the Mini but sees even that machine as too half-way of a compromise, not quite right for the entry level as is but not quite a midrange machine either.
By in essence splitting the Mini into two products, one focused on cost-effectiveness/value and the other on sheer sexiness/smallness/suitability for unique new purposes, Apple could address quite a few of the current gaps in the Mac product matrix while avoiding the creation of another “G4 Cube” that overlaps other products too much in some areas and doesn’t offer a good enough value proposition in others….but we have a lot more investigating to do before we can say with confidence that we believe the current “Mac Air” rumors are accurate.
Stay tuned to Rumors for much more on these topics, including an in-depth look at the next generation Mac Mini, iMac and Mac Pro in an upcoming examination of the current desktop lineup, its past & future!
Related Posts: