Apple quietly adds 3.33GHz quad-core Mac Pro to keep up with iMac, but fails to match value

Apple has, with little fanfare, added a 3.33GHz Core i7 Xeon 3500 (Bloomfield) option to its Mac Pro lineup for quad-core/single-chip models. Comments by the usual suspects in Cupertino have mirrored community speculation that this is a (weak) response to the new quad-core iMac clearly crushing the value equation of the Pro….but due to its dependence on costly Xeon-class chips, that equation has not changed.

Until Apple is willing to offer a so-called “xMac” model — a headless Pro-class computer with desktop-class Core i7 2G (Lynnfield, as in the high end iMac) chips instead of the far more costly Xeons — the Mac Pro will always be hobbled in competition for the budget-minded power user.

Such prototypes have been spotted in the past, but a variety of factors….notably Apple’s close-knit relationship with Intel which typically dictates which chips it uses even if they aren’t necessarily the absolute best choices for a given market segment….have stood in the way of actual production machines of this type.

Could such a mid-range minitower Mac finally see the light of day in 2010? Stay tuned for some very interesting dirt on this topic when source embargoes expire in the coming days….


Share this post: Share this article on FacebookShare this Article on TwitterAdd this Article to StumbleuponAdd this Article to Del.icio.usAdd this Article to DiggAdd this Article to RedditAdd this Article to Newsvine
This entry was posted in Apple Hardware, Apple Inc. and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

2 Comments

  1. cutthroughthebs
    Posted March 14, 2010 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    There is NO comparison! For audio and video pros the iMac falls flat on it's face! No PCIe or any HD storage options… no, not even a contender!

  2. cutthroughthebs
    Posted March 14, 2010 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    There is NO comparison! For audio and video pros the iMac falls flat on it's face! No PCIe or any HD storage options… no, not even a contender!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus