Sony pouting over Macbook Air: thinks they did it first, better

In an interview with Gizmodo, Sonys senior vice president of VAIO product marketing Mike Abary gives Apple credit for getting a machine like the Macbook Air so small and thin, but thinks the concessions necessary to do so make the device unwanted by consumers. In his view consumers just don’t care that much about the ultra thinness factor, making the price premium to design and sell a laptop of this sort more than consumers are willing to pay, and he may be right but only to a point. There remains a significant market for the Macbook Air even if it isn’t for everyone.

Mr. Abarys animosity may have something to do with the fact that Sony tried to go down this path in 2004 with a concept model called the X505, which would have been slightly thicker than the Macbook Air and made of carbon fiber. Consumers didn’t like the X505 at the time, in part because the optical drive was definitely necessary at the time and may even be necessary for many users today. That plan was scrapped but the development process eventually turned out the series Jobs hates so much: the Sony TZ.

In his view, Abary thinks the one feature missing from the Macbook Air is 3G wireless, though we have to believe that this may have only made potential customers even more unhappy with Apple since it would likely be impossible to support all common wireless networks, the same problem potential iPhone customers face now. Given the relative ubiquity of Wi-Fi networks and the fact that any laptop can be tethered to a cell phone for internet access, we don’t think integrated wireless is such a huge strike against the Macbook Air in 2008.


Share this post: Share this article on Facebook Share this Article on Twitter Add this Article to Stumbleupon Add this Article to Del.icio.us Add this Article to Digg Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Newsvine
This entry was posted in Apple Hardware and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • theoldmiami

    Could this have anything to do with the absence of any Blu-Ray announcements at MacWorld?

  • http://www.ryanvsdorkman.com Jason

    For me, a portable needs to be as portable for as long as possible; ie, battery life. I bought my Tibook because of this, and I’ll probably buy the Air for this reason too. I rarely ever use my optical drive, and I love that it weighs half as much as mine (never mind the screen).

    I’ll tell you a secret though; if they made it a skoonch thicker (say, .6″ all around) added a pound’s worth of batteries, and brought it up to 7 hours of life, I’d buy one right now.

  • bongo

    Agree with Jason.
    That is the sort of device I am looking for (for years already).

  • Jodeo

    MacBook Air: Cube ’08.

  • Jeremy

    @Jodeo

    the Cube actually failed because of quality control issues and a very high price. The Air (with the regular drive) is very affordable, and has no build issues so far.

  • Scott

    I don’t understand why people keep comparing the Air to the Cube. Not even close. As Jeremy said, it was price that killed the Cube ( not aware of build issues). Bought my Cube as a floor display at Circuit City (priced right at $975.00). It was a great machine. Traded it in for an iMac G5. I might even try and buy it back from the person I sold it to when they’re done with it.

    The Air will be successful because it fills a need that hasn’t been filled since they axed the 12″ PB.

  • http://wordpress.org Snow

    Well I must say that there are users for which the absence of 3G wireless is a deal breaker in a laptop the sports just two ports and is clearly intended for mobility.

    I use an USB dongle to go online via UMTS with my current MacBook. I’d bought an Air with internal UMTS without thinking, but I am not going to waste the only USB port on that thing.

    Maybe it is because Apple is an American company and UMTS is not common in the US, but I find the lack of 3G surprising – and a deal breaker.

  • Jim

    I was really looking forward to a compact 12″ business tool (MacBook Air). It supports hi-res external displays (unlike the 12″ MacBook), but the 2GB of ram is a serious limitation for running Parallels & XP for those few business applications that are not available on Mac. The lack of more optional ram is a serious shortcoming for me.

    A decade ago a similar sized (but thicker) PowerBook 2400 was that perfect tool.

    And the Cube was a perfect family-room computer, because it was SILENT.

  • Chop

    So all we need is a 1/2 inch thick external battery that clamps solid to the Air, and a UMTS dongle with a built-in passive USB hub, and everyone here will be happy?

    I’d say that was a pretty good design.

  • John C. Randolph

    Jeremy is mistaken: the cube didn’t fail, it just wasn’t as big a seller as other models have been. It made a profit.

    -jcr