<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments for Mac OS Rumors</title> <atom:link href="http://macosrumors.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://macosrumors.com</link> <description>The original Apple &#38; Mac rumor site</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Comment on January 27th Apple Event Preview part 3: New &#8220;Tablet OS&#8221; and iPhone OS by buck03</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2010/01/27/january-apple-event-preview-p3-new-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link> <dc:creator>buck03</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:46:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1493#comment-2595</guid> <description>Wow!  They talked about absolutely none of this today!  I hope this stuff comes true because today wasn&#039;t too hot</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  They talked about absolutely none of this today!  I hope this stuff comes true because today wasn&#39;t too hot</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on It wouldn&#8217;t be January without&#8230;. by Calenril</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2010/01/25/it-wouldnt-be-january-without/comment-page-1/#comment-2596</link> <dc:creator>Calenril</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:33:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1455#comment-2596</guid> <description>The new device will be called the Steve-iDoor, and among other things is designed to increase adoration of Steve Jobs and will double as a hat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new device will be called the Steve-iDoor, and among other things is designed to increase adoration of Steve Jobs and will double as a hat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on What&#8217;s next for iMac and Mac Pro? by christox</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/11/28/whats-next-for-imac-mac-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link> <dc:creator>christox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:42:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1406#comment-2594</guid> <description>I also want usb 3.0 and better GPU&#039;s on the 27&quot; iMac</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also want usb 3.0 and better GPU&#39;s on the 27&#8243; iMac</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Facebook 3.1 App released, includes Push support by celulares</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2010/01/06/facebook-3-1-app-released-includes-push-support/comment-page-1/#comment-2598</link> <dc:creator>celulares</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1423#comment-2598</guid> <description>Nice, it was about time they updated. Push support has months now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, it was about time they updated. Push support has months now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on What&#8217;s next for iMac and Mac Pro? by christox</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/11/28/whats-next-for-imac-mac-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-2593</link> <dc:creator>christox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:37:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1406#comment-2593</guid> <description>I want usb 3.0 on the iMac&#039;s and better GPU&#039;s</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want usb 3.0 on the iMac&#39;s and better GPU&#39;s</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on iTunes 9 still not 64-bit, internally referred to as &#8220;iTunes X&#8221; by Tony</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/09/09/itunes-still-not-64-bit-internally-referred-to-as-itunes-x/comment-page-1/#comment-2597</link> <dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:34:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1269#comment-2597</guid> <description>For what it&#039;s worth, iTunesX.pkg has been part of the iTunes install for a long time -- at least since I remember seeing it with version 7. I think it might&#039;ve honestly come about as in &quot;iTunes for OS X.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#39;s worth, iTunesX.pkg has been part of the iTunes install for a long time &#8212; at least since I remember seeing it with version 7. I think it might&#39;ve honestly come about as in &#8220;iTunes for OS X.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on What&#8217;s next for iMac and Mac Pro? by Kevbrad</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/11/28/whats-next-for-imac-mac-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-2591</link> <dc:creator>Kevbrad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:38:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1406#comment-2591</guid> <description>Apparently Apple realizes that the MacPro needs to separate itself from the new iMac. As an owner of a 2009 MacPro, I received a online survey from Apple yesterday about how I use the machine, and what I would like see added to a future version. We all know that the processors will scale up with new i7&#039;s &amp; i9&#039;s, but I told them that more powerful GPU&#039;s, especially 2x cards or SLA/Crossfire support was important because OpenCL would scale up performance to greater level then the new iMac (with new enclosure on the iMac heat will be more or an issue). I would also like to see Apple add a larger LED Cinema Display now that the have it up to 27&quot; on the iMac.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Apple realizes that the MacPro needs to separate itself from the new iMac. As an owner of a 2009 MacPro, I received a online survey from Apple yesterday about how I use the machine, and what I would like see added to a future version. We all know that the processors will scale up with new i7&#39;s &#038; i9&#39;s, but I told them that more powerful GPU&#39;s, especially 2x cards or SLA/Crossfire support was important because OpenCL would scale up performance to greater level then the new iMac (with new enclosure on the iMac heat will be more or an issue). I would also like to see Apple add a larger LED Cinema Display now that the have it up to 27&#8243; on the iMac.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on What&#8217;s next for iMac and Mac Pro? by frlane</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/11/28/whats-next-for-imac-mac-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-2590</link> <dc:creator>frlane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1406#comment-2590</guid> <description>I am one of the &#039;Pro&#039; users that has never considered an iMac.  However, my dual G5 PowerMac was dying, and the old 17&quot; square monitor was looking small these days.  So, I could get a MacPro and a new monitor and spend $6000, or get an i7 iMac with a 27&quot; monitor built in for $2300.  I chose the iMac, and it is AWESOME!  I am able to edit HD video much more efficiently, and the screen is incredible.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks Apple for finally making a powerful iMac, and for allowing it to cannibalize the &#039;Pro&#039; line!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the &#39;Pro&#39; users that has never considered an iMac.  However, my dual G5 PowerMac was dying, and the old 17&#8243; square monitor was looking small these days.  So, I could get a MacPro and a new monitor and spend $6000, or get an i7 iMac with a 27&#8243; monitor built in for $2300.  I chose the iMac, and it is AWESOME!  I am able to edit HD video much more efficiently, and the screen is incredible.</p><p>Thanks Apple for finally making a powerful iMac, and for allowing it to cannibalize the &#39;Pro&#39; line!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Apples tiny new server by jsepeta</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/10/20/apples-tiny-new-server/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link> <dc:creator>jsepeta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1383#comment-2588</guid> <description>it still costs too damned  much.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it still costs too damned  much.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Will my GPU be fully supported by Snow Leopard&#8217;s OpenCL? by Nvidia announces drivers for Windows 7 beta &#171; Gadgetsteria</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/02/11/will-my-gpu-support-opencl/comment-page-1/#comment-2587</link> <dc:creator>Nvidia announces drivers for Windows 7 beta &#171; Gadgetsteria</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=595#comment-2587</guid> <description>[...] &#8220;Grand Central&#8221; supposed to incorporate GPU computing in Snow Leopard?  An article by Mac OS Rumors highlights what Snow Leopards support for GPU processing will look like as well as what cards will [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Grand Central&#8221; supposed to incorporate GPU computing in Snow Leopard?  An article by Mac OS Rumors highlights what Snow Leopards support for GPU processing will look like as well as what cards will [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Latest WebKit nightly build includes built-in update functionality by pepijn de Vos</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/13/latest-webkit-nightly-build-includes-built-in-update-functionality/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link> <dc:creator>pepijn de Vos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=307#comment-2589</guid> <description>@jms: same for me, I&#039;m downloading Webkit now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jms: same for me, I&#39;m downloading Webkit now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Latest WebKit nightly build includes built-in update functionality by jms</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/13/latest-webkit-nightly-build-includes-built-in-update-functionality/comment-page-1/#comment-2583</link> <dc:creator>jms</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=307#comment-2583</guid> <description>I know this is very old news by now, but just today I was wondering about that and your article was exactly what I needed! Thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is very old news by now, but just today I was wondering about that and your article was exactly what I needed! Thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Why the Mini has 2 different video ports by jeux pokemon</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/03/why-the-mini-has-2-different-video-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-2586</link> <dc:creator>jeux pokemon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:33:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=678#comment-2586</guid> <description>There have been some complaints about the Mini Displayport to DVI adapter being incompatible with some monitors, though admittedly not as many problems as the Mini Displayport to Dual link DVI fiasco. So Apple may have 2 reasons for including 2 different kinds of ports, after all they could have just stuck with Mini Displayport.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been some complaints about the Mini Displayport to DVI adapter being incompatible with some monitors, though admittedly not as many problems as the Mini Displayport to Dual link DVI fiasco. So Apple may have 2 reasons for including 2 different kinds of ports, after all they could have just stuck with Mini Displayport.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on iTunes 9 still not 64-bit, internally referred to as &#8220;iTunes X&#8221; by wesley</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/09/09/itunes-still-not-64-bit-internally-referred-to-as-itunes-x/comment-page-1/#comment-2585</link> <dc:creator>wesley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:13:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1269#comment-2585</guid> <description>when will the imac be updated with quad cores? Please do an update to your old i7 article. Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will the imac be updated with quad cores? Please do an update to your old i7 article. Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on 2009 Music Event LIVE Coverage by Kris Goodman</title><link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/09/08/2009-music-event-live-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-2553</link> <dc:creator>Kris Goodman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1113#comment-2553</guid> <description>Can&#039;t wait to find out all the new exciting stuff coming out from Apple later today :D All Music bassed tho!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#39;t wait to find out all the new exciting stuff coming out from Apple later today <img src='http://macosrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> All Music bassed tho!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Database Caching 2/22 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached

Served from: macosrumors.com @ 2010-03-16 17:30:31 -->