<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari 4 faster, more stable on Snow Leopard than 10.5.x</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/</link>
	<description>The original Apple &#38; Mac rumor site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Metalizer</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/comment-page-1/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Metalizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>have actually had a few crashes already with Safari 4 on OS X 10.4.11 Tiger,&lt;br&gt;Power PC, (PowerBook G4, 1.67)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have actually had a few crashes already with Safari 4 on OS X 10.4.11 Tiger,<br />Power PC, (PowerBook G4, 1.67)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmitri</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>dmitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d wager it is even worse on 10.4 ....i downgraded after less than one week due to AWFUL performance, and BUGS&lt;br&gt;i was quite sad, because I was starting to like it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#39;d wager it is even worse on 10.4 &#8230;.i downgraded after less than one week due to AWFUL performance, and BUGS<br />i was quite sad, because I was starting to like it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metalizer</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Metalizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>have actually had a few crashes already with Safari 4 on OS X 10.4.11 Tiger,&lt;br&gt;Power PC, (PowerBook G4, 1.67)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have actually had a few crashes already with Safari 4 on OS X 10.4.11 Tiger,<br />Power PC, (PowerBook G4, 1.67)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmitri</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/06/26/safari-faster-more-stable-on-106/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>dmitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=1039#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d wager it is even worse on 10.4 ....i downgraded after less than one week due to AWFUL performance, and BUGS&lt;br&gt;i was quite sad, because I was starting to like it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#39;d wager it is even worse on 10.4 &#8230;.i downgraded after less than one week due to AWFUL performance, and BUGS<br />i was quite sad, because I was starting to like it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

