<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th Apple Event</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/</link>
	<description>The original Apple &#38; Mac rumor site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re still hoping to be the first to show off pictures of the new 16-core/redesigned-enclosure Mac Pro that could be here as soon as the summer...and we suspect that the enclosure will still be relatively similar to what we originally described. But it&#039;s anyone&#039;s game at the moment because so much is changing so rapidly at Apple -- even as the fundamental fact that NeXT actually acquired Apple, rather than the other way around, is unchanging. That highly technologically innovative nature to back up the image and the software, the style with substance, isn&#039;t what&#039;s changing at all. 

You can believe that we are just itching to show you what the &quot;bad-ass black &amp; silver&quot; Mac Pro full-tower looks like, and we&#039;re even more frustrated that it isn&#039;t already headed to the market. It would certainly be expensive to produce, and couldn&#039;t be shipped in quantity for another 6-10 weeks but even just knowing that Infinite Loop&#039;s ambitions are as stratospheric as they are has a value to Apple, we believe.

Otherwise, we would probably sit on more rumors ourselves and be more conservative in our predictions....but from our early days as Steve Jobs aggressively plugged the company&#039;s &quot;leaks&quot; in the late 90&#039;s, we have tried to act as a motivator for Apple to correct that course, to seek a middle ground where they could truly embrace the &quot;radical openness&quot; of the so-called Social Era.

As our founder once told Steve Jobs directly in an email (which Steve promptly made the butt of some internal jokes, we later found out...though should Ryan really have been surprised? Even he no longer thinks so), we&#039;d be quite happy if Apple made us more or less obsolete by being more open, by engaging with &quot;rumor sites&quot; and the Mac Web with a mix of more access to the internal goings-on of the company and simply more effort to have an active hand in shaping such things.

Instead, Ryan was met with ridicule and no direct response by Steve, which is more or less itself par for the course even several years before he had his surgery and became chronically ill. If we sent the same email today, we&#039;d hardly expect a response in any case, and rightly so....but then, as now, we saw the topic as an important change of direction for the company.

Nobody&#039;s suggesting that Apple change its stripes; it presents a sleek image and doesn&#039;t want to pull back the veneer too far. Again, rightly so. But, that image could gain a depth that it has lacked for some time, in the eyes of quite a lot of people.

There&#039;s a reason that the very first site fully dedicated to Apple rumors (all due credit to grandmasters such as the multiple incarnations of Mac the Knife, may he Rest in Peace until &amp; unless someone can genuinely resurrect him -- at which point we&#039;d be honored to have him guest write for Rumors!) is still around today. That is more or less the same reason why there are so many others, whether or not they truly deserve the label of regurgitation &quot;copycats.&quot;

The reason is simple.....Steve Jobs has had more important things to focus on over the past five years than getting on board with the social networking train, or the latest Internet groupthink in general. He is predisposed for many reasons -- something we hardly begrudge -- to shield his nearly life-long baby from damaging things like bad press, an inconsistent image, or the zig-zags of direction that the company took in his absence during the 80&#039;s and early to mid 90&#039;s. And now, in a transition period where regardless of his near-term &quot;return&quot; a lot of things will be evolving no matter what....there is an opportunity for Apple to embrace at least some element of showing off its developmental technologies in hardware as well as software sooner to counter the rest of the industry engaging on that very same level if not more so.

This could easily be the key to cracking the remaining 85% of the market, in our opinion. Perhaps that&#039;s inevitable given what we do, but we&#039;ve been saying it for more than a decade and nothing we&#039;ve seen in that time has caused us to waver from the belief....in fact, most recently as the &quot;radically open&quot; style of social-networking has helped so many small companies skyrocket into success despite the challenging times, that belief has only strengthened.

That&#039;s why we think that despite the recent stumbles on more than a few of the desktop update details (to say nothing of the predicted timing, which is of course always tied to what we&#039;re really likely to get from the announcement), these more ambitious Macs &amp; iDevices that we&#039;ve been talking about -- are continuing to talk about -- are not far away in time nor space.

Not everyone at Apple believes that loyalty to the ideals of a &quot;NeXT Apple&quot; with Steve Jobs as its omnipresent captain necessarily entails following every policy that he has dictated since his return to the company. In fact, if we should deign to quote a friend who is still in regular contact with Jobs in turn quoting the man himself: &quot;Not everything I&#039;ve ever said was right and if it was, it doesn&#039;t always still apply.&quot; 

If someone who has been put on a such pedestal and who has such relative faith in his own judgement as Steve can say that as recently as a few weeks ago, in reference to decisions made by executives at Infinite Loop during his day-to-day physical absence which might contradict calls he made not terribly long ago...then even among those at Apple that might want to cautiously follow his every style or standing policy can be expected to be open to embracing a shift that could unlock barriers to the company&#039;s success virtually since its success was first ensured by Mac OS X, the iMac and iPod in the early days after NeXT became Apple became NeXT.

And no, that was not a typo. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re still hoping to be the first to show off pictures of the new 16-core/redesigned-enclosure Mac Pro that could be here as soon as the summer&#8230;and we suspect that the enclosure will still be relatively similar to what we originally described. But it&#8217;s anyone&#8217;s game at the moment because so much is changing so rapidly at Apple &#8212; even as the fundamental fact that NeXT actually acquired Apple, rather than the other way around, is unchanging. That highly technologically innovative nature to back up the image and the software, the style with substance, isn&#8217;t what&#8217;s changing at all. </p>
<p>You can believe that we are just itching to show you what the &#8220;bad-ass black &amp; silver&#8221; Mac Pro full-tower looks like, and we&#8217;re even more frustrated that it isn&#8217;t already headed to the market. It would certainly be expensive to produce, and couldn&#8217;t be shipped in quantity for another 6-10 weeks but even just knowing that Infinite Loop&#8217;s ambitions are as stratospheric as they are has a value to Apple, we believe.</p>
<p>Otherwise, we would probably sit on more rumors ourselves and be more conservative in our predictions&#8230;.but from our early days as Steve Jobs aggressively plugged the company&#8217;s &#8220;leaks&#8221; in the late 90&#8242;s, we have tried to act as a motivator for Apple to correct that course, to seek a middle ground where they could truly embrace the &#8220;radical openness&#8221; of the so-called Social Era.</p>
<p>As our founder once told Steve Jobs directly in an email (which Steve promptly made the butt of some internal jokes, we later found out&#8230;though should Ryan really have been surprised? Even he no longer thinks so), we&#8217;d be quite happy if Apple made us more or less obsolete by being more open, by engaging with &#8220;rumor sites&#8221; and the Mac Web with a mix of more access to the internal goings-on of the company and simply more effort to have an active hand in shaping such things.</p>
<p>Instead, Ryan was met with ridicule and no direct response by Steve, which is more or less itself par for the course even several years before he had his surgery and became chronically ill. If we sent the same email today, we&#8217;d hardly expect a response in any case, and rightly so&#8230;.but then, as now, we saw the topic as an important change of direction for the company.</p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s suggesting that Apple change its stripes; it presents a sleek image and doesn&#8217;t want to pull back the veneer too far. Again, rightly so. But, that image could gain a depth that it has lacked for some time, in the eyes of quite a lot of people.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason that the very first site fully dedicated to Apple rumors (all due credit to grandmasters such as the multiple incarnations of Mac the Knife, may he Rest in Peace until &amp; unless someone can genuinely resurrect him &#8212; at which point we&#8217;d be honored to have him guest write for Rumors!) is still around today. That is more or less the same reason why there are so many others, whether or not they truly deserve the label of regurgitation &#8220;copycats.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason is simple&#8230;..Steve Jobs has had more important things to focus on over the past five years than getting on board with the social networking train, or the latest Internet groupthink in general. He is predisposed for many reasons &#8212; something we hardly begrudge &#8212; to shield his nearly life-long baby from damaging things like bad press, an inconsistent image, or the zig-zags of direction that the company took in his absence during the 80&#8242;s and early to mid 90&#8242;s. And now, in a transition period where regardless of his near-term &#8220;return&#8221; a lot of things will be evolving no matter what&#8230;.there is an opportunity for Apple to embrace at least some element of showing off its developmental technologies in hardware as well as software sooner to counter the rest of the industry engaging on that very same level if not more so.</p>
<p>This could easily be the key to cracking the remaining 85% of the market, in our opinion. Perhaps that&#8217;s inevitable given what we do, but we&#8217;ve been saying it for more than a decade and nothing we&#8217;ve seen in that time has caused us to waver from the belief&#8230;.in fact, most recently as the &#8220;radically open&#8221; style of social-networking has helped so many small companies skyrocket into success despite the challenging times, that belief has only strengthened.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we think that despite the recent stumbles on more than a few of the desktop update details (to say nothing of the predicted timing, which is of course always tied to what we&#8217;re really likely to get from the announcement), these more ambitious Macs &amp; iDevices that we&#8217;ve been talking about &#8212; are continuing to talk about &#8212; are not far away in time nor space.</p>
<p>Not everyone at Apple believes that loyalty to the ideals of a &#8220;NeXT Apple&#8221; with Steve Jobs as its omnipresent captain necessarily entails following every policy that he has dictated since his return to the company. In fact, if we should deign to quote a friend who is still in regular contact with Jobs in turn quoting the man himself: &#8220;Not everything I&#8217;ve ever said was right and if it was, it doesn&#8217;t always still apply.&#8221; </p>
<p>If someone who has been put on a such pedestal and who has such relative faith in his own judgement as Steve can say that as recently as a few weeks ago, in reference to decisions made by executives at Infinite Loop during his day-to-day physical absence which might contradict calls he made not terribly long ago&#8230;then even among those at Apple that might want to cautiously follow his every style or standing policy can be expected to be open to embracing a shift that could unlock barriers to the company&#8217;s success virtually since its success was first ensured by Mac OS X, the iMac and iPod in the early days after NeXT became Apple became NeXT.</p>
<p>And no, that was not a typo. <img src='http://macosrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>You definitely have us on the timing, but i7 is definitely coming to the whole Mac family before long. The question is what chipsets will be used in what models, what sorts of enclosure changes will come with those updates if any, and, ultimately....when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You definitely have us on the timing, but i7 is definitely coming to the whole Mac family before long. The question is what chipsets will be used in what models, what sorts of enclosure changes will come with those updates if any, and, ultimately&#8230;.when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cc</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>New iMacs just introduced and you or your sources were just plain wrong...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New iMacs just introduced and you or your sources were just plain wrong&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>I still hope your right about the iMac having a i7 Nehalem, but ya&#039;ll are the only people on the planet who are promoting this idea that iMac will use nehalem in this update coming this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still hope your right about the iMac having a i7 Nehalem, but ya&#8217;ll are the only people on the planet who are promoting this idea that iMac will use nehalem in this update coming this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tallest Skil</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallest Skil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, MacOSRumors, I just can&#039;t believe that Apple would use Beckton in the next Mac Pro. Beckton (the only 16 core setup in existence) would take the price of the Mac Pro FAR above that of the ability of any single user to purchase one, further alienating the professional market from buying one. Even using Gainestown, the most logical next chip, the price is expected to increase by $200, taking the standard configuration to $2,999. I&#039;d love to see some pictures of the new design that you saw, as well as pictures of the insides (because Tylersburg doesn&#039;t fit in the current case).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, MacOSRumors, I just can&#8217;t believe that Apple would use Beckton in the next Mac Pro. Beckton (the only 16 core setup in existence) would take the price of the Mac Pro FAR above that of the ability of any single user to purchase one, further alienating the professional market from buying one. Even using Gainestown, the most logical next chip, the price is expected to increase by $200, taking the standard configuration to $2,999. I&#8217;d love to see some pictures of the new design that you saw, as well as pictures of the insides (because Tylersburg doesn&#8217;t fit in the current case).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agencehorizon (agencehorizon)</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>agencehorizon (agencehorizon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/macosrumors&quot;&gt;@macosrumors&lt;/a&gt;: BREAKING RUMOR: #iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th #Apple Event http://macosrumors.com/?p=654</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/macosrumors">@macosrumors</a>: BREAKING RUMOR: #iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th #Apple Event <a href="http://macosrumors.com/?p=654" rel="nofollow">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dburr (Donald Burr of Borg)</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>dburr (Donald Burr of Borg)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/macosrumors&quot;&gt;@macosrumors&lt;/a&gt;: BREAKING RUMOR: #iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th #Apple Event http://macosrumors.com/?p=654 #MacOSRumors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/macosrumors">@macosrumors</a>: BREAKING RUMOR: #iMac and possibly Mini to be updated at March 24th #Apple Event <a href="http://macosrumors.com/?p=654" rel="nofollow">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654</a> #MacOSRumors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan C. Meader</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/03/02/march-24-apple-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan C. Meader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=654#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Also, reports are coming in from across the globe that supplies of current generation iMacs -- notably the high end versions -- are rapidly shrinking. This is another sign that the rumor is at least basically accurate, and new iMacs will be shipping within a matter of weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, reports are coming in from across the globe that supplies of current generation iMacs &#8212; notably the high end versions &#8212; are rapidly shrinking. This is another sign that the rumor is at least basically accurate, and new iMacs will be shipping within a matter of weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

