<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impressive new details of next-gen Mac Pro emerge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/</link>
	<description>The original Apple &#38; Mac rumor site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tallest Skil</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallest Skil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>@Nathan

Looking at the website, it looks like Bluetooth is built into the current model, as well as having been an option on the last model. 

So what are you talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan</p>
<p>Looking at the website, it looks like Bluetooth is built into the current model, as well as having been an option on the last model. </p>
<p>So what are you talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>How about bluetooth support finally?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about bluetooth support finally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falkowski (Brendan Falkowski)</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>falkowski (Brendan Falkowski)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Om nom nom...hungry Mac Pro news http://is.gd/ikmR http://is.gd/iap4 http://is.gd/is0K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om nom nom&#8230;hungry Mac Pro news <a href="http://is.gd/ikmR" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/ikmR</a> <a href="http://is.gd/iap4" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/iap4</a> <a href="http://is.gd/is0K" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/is0K</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>Any way to get some CineBench 1o numbers MacOSR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way to get some CineBench 1o numbers MacOSR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>More on i7: Intel to detail eight-core Xeon processor (Feb 9 preview)
http://www.macworld.com/article/138510/2009/01/intel.html?lsrc=rss_main</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on i7: Intel to detail eight-core Xeon processor (Feb 9 preview)<br />
<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/138510/2009/01/intel.html?lsrc=rss_main" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/article/138510/2009/01/intel.html?lsrc=rss_main</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>The ATI 3600 card seems to be discontinued on the ATI site. Only the 3800 variant can be bought.

Why would APPL use such a low end card when the 4800 series is available and according to the specs you provide is more than capable of running a 4800 with 512, or even a 4800 with 2048?

The former can be had for 200-285 US, while the later comes in at 400-500 US. Many will not buy any MP with the very low GUI spec you site.

Further, using ATI instead on Nvidia seems out of keeping with APPLs current GUI strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ATI 3600 card seems to be discontinued on the ATI site. Only the 3800 variant can be bought.</p>
<p>Why would APPL use such a low end card when the 4800 series is available and according to the specs you provide is more than capable of running a 4800 with 512, or even a 4800 with 2048?</p>
<p>The former can be had for 200-285 US, while the later comes in at 400-500 US. Many will not buy any MP with the very low GUI spec you site.</p>
<p>Further, using ATI instead on Nvidia seems out of keeping with APPLs current GUI strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>I am so disappointed.  :(  I like all the new specs. of this new Mac Pro.  The things I don&#039;t like are that:

1. They are making the form factor/footprint bigger than it already is.
2. It does not sound like they are making a smaller version of the Mac Pro (i.e. mini-tower or smaller).

The current Mac Pro is a behemoth.  It is big enough and I can see where some people may need a machine that size.  But for hardcore gamers or the mac user that does not need all that expandability but likes all the power, a smaller machine with just as much power and not as many slots/expandability would be preferred.

I have been hoping they would make a smaller version of the Mac Pro as an option, along with the current behemoth version, a Mac Pro mini or something along those lines.  But I guess I am waiting in vein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so disappointed.  <img src='http://macosrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   I like all the new specs. of this new Mac Pro.  The things I don&#8217;t like are that:</p>
<p>1. They are making the form factor/footprint bigger than it already is.<br />
2. It does not sound like they are making a smaller version of the Mac Pro (i.e. mini-tower or smaller).</p>
<p>The current Mac Pro is a behemoth.  It is big enough and I can see where some people may need a machine that size.  But for hardcore gamers or the mac user that does not need all that expandability but likes all the power, a smaller machine with just as much power and not as many slots/expandability would be preferred.</p>
<p>I have been hoping they would make a smaller version of the Mac Pro as an option, along with the current behemoth version, a Mac Pro mini or something along those lines.  But I guess I am waiting in vein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septimus</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Septimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>I wonder if we will see nVidia 200 series videocards in the new Mac Pro like GeForce GTX 295. Hope Apple will abandon low budget cards like ATI&#039;s HD 2600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we will see nVidia 200 series videocards in the new Mac Pro like GeForce GTX 295. Hope Apple will abandon low budget cards like ATI&#8217;s HD 2600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/28/impressive-new-details-of-next-gen-mac-pro-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=520#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Fantastic!
March? Too lateeeee!!!!
I want it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic!<br />
March? Too lateeeee!!!!<br />
I want it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

