<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next for Apple: Mac Pros and Xserves based on Intel Core i7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/</link>
	<description>The original Apple &#38; Mac rumor site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-2/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>Watch for a &quot;founder&#039;s column&quot; about this topic before the end of the week.....and see our team&#039;s Twitter feeds (starting with @MacOSRumors) for somewhat more detail on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch for a &#8220;founder&#8217;s column&#8221; about this topic before the end of the week&#8230;..and see our team&#8217;s Twitter feeds (starting with @MacOSRumors) for somewhat more detail on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-2/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>So &#039;admin&#039; - do you still stand by all of this? Considering new mac pro&#039;s were released just a few days ago (early march) and have no cosmetic changes like you describe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8216;admin&#8217; &#8211; do you still stand by all of this? Considering new mac pro&#8217;s were released just a few days ago (early march) and have no cosmetic changes like you describe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OS X 10.5.7 nearing beta phase; focuses on hardware support (new Macs) &#38; bug fixes &#124; Mac OS Rumors</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-2/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>OS X 10.5.7 nearing beta phase; focuses on hardware support (new Macs) &#38; bug fixes &#124; Mac OS Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Gainestown&#8221; Core i7 Xeon based Mac Pro &amp; Xserve shipping around the end of March (additional details), and the next generation Macbook family (all three models including Air &amp; Pro) which will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Gainestown&#8221; Core i7 Xeon based Mac Pro &#38; Xserve shipping around the end of March (additional details), and the next generation Macbook family (all three models including Air &#38; Pro) which will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-2/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed -- we&#039;re working on exactly that as we speak, in fact! 

You can see special behind the scenes updates about such things, like what article(s) we are currently working on, simply by following our Twitter feed: &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/macosrumors&quot; target&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/macosrumors&lt;/a&gt;

You can also follow our founder, Ryan Meader, who posts some relevant tweets to his feed as well: &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/dalaixerces&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/dalaixerces&lt;/a&gt;

We will have a page here on the site soon that will list relevant tweets from staff and others (readers, etc), but for now they can be found on Twitter itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed &#8212; we&#8217;re working on exactly that as we speak, in fact! </p>
<p>You can see special behind the scenes updates about such things, like what article(s) we are currently working on, simply by following our Twitter feed: <a href="http://twitter.com/macosrumors" target"_new" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/macosrumors</a></p>
<p>You can also follow our founder, Ryan Meader, who posts some relevant tweets to his feed as well: <a href="http://twitter.com/dalaixerces" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/dalaixerces</a></p>
<p>We will have a page here on the site soon that will list relevant tweets from staff and others (readers, etc), but for now they can be found on Twitter itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Setmose</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-2/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Setmose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Ok, 3 weeks since this Jan 9 rumor. Any follow up from the &quot;editors&quot; involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, 3 weeks since this Jan 9 rumor. Any follow up from the &#8220;editors&#8221; involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurgeFilter</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>SurgeFilter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>I always wondered if anybody has updated their original Xeon quad in their original MacPro to something faster by pulling the processors and inserting newer models e.g. pulling an original 4-core to an 8-core for example.

Just wondering if it&#039;ll be possible for original 4-core owners to do this with faster Core i7&#039;s in the future (obviously after Snow Leopard is out)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered if anybody has updated their original Xeon quad in their original MacPro to something faster by pulling the processors and inserting newer models e.g. pulling an original 4-core to an 8-core for example.</p>
<p>Just wondering if it&#8217;ll be possible for original 4-core owners to do this with faster Core i7&#8242;s in the future (obviously after Snow Leopard is out)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>March!?!?! Too late for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March!?!?! Too late for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>Apple has always used Xeons for the MacPros since the switch to Intel. If Intel keeps to its roll out schedule, Core i7 Xeons are due in latter March? Doesn&#039;t Apple plan to replace the Penryn Xeons with the Nehalem (Core i7) Xeons in its upcoming MacPros?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has always used Xeons for the MacPros since the switch to Intel. If Intel keeps to its roll out schedule, Core i7 Xeons are due in latter March? Doesn&#8217;t Apple plan to replace the Penryn Xeons with the Nehalem (Core i7) Xeons in its upcoming MacPros?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m waiting for the my first Mac, the new MacPro!
But...the release date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m waiting for the my first Mac, the new MacPro!<br />
But&#8230;the release date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll definitely hold out buying my new Mac for this computer.  When can we hope to see it hit the street???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll definitely hold out buying my new Mac for this computer.  When can we hope to see it hit the street???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Giltner</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Giltner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Are these new Mac Pro&#039;s based on the existing Nehalem processors, or are they based on the as-yet-unreleased Gainsfield line of Nehalem processors ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these new Mac Pro&#8217;s based on the existing Nehalem processors, or are they based on the as-yet-unreleased Gainsfield line of Nehalem processors ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>Coming up very soon; we&#039;re working on that very thing as we speak and the West Coast team has some really great source phone calls for us to catch up on this weekend. Pretty heavy dirt and a lot of Nehalem benchmarks from the developers/testers themselves, we hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming up very soon; we&#8217;re working on that very thing as we speak and the West Coast team has some really great source phone calls for us to catch up on this weekend. Pretty heavy dirt and a lot of Nehalem benchmarks from the developers/testers themselves, we hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Falkowski</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Falkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starving for a new Mac Pro to run Aperture. Could you please throw in some benchmarks for the app? Also, you said black+silver but didn&#039;t say if it was ugly or pretty...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starving for a new Mac Pro to run Aperture. Could you please throw in some benchmarks for the app? Also, you said black+silver but didn&#8217;t say if it was ugly or pretty&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>If this info is indeed reliable, then it would warrant a few extra weeks added to my Mac Pro purchase hold up.

Please, keep me up with ANY reliable news in the upcoming weeks as I&#039;m eager to know about an imminent release date of the much anticipated Mac update.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this info is indeed reliable, then it would warrant a few extra weeks added to my Mac Pro purchase hold up.</p>
<p>Please, keep me up with ANY reliable news in the upcoming weeks as I&#8217;m eager to know about an imminent release date of the much anticipated Mac update.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://macosrumors.com/2009/01/09/next-for-apple-mac-pros-and-xserves-based-on-intel-core-i7/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macosrumors.com/?p=288#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Great question, Chark! We hope to be far more active in these moderated comments sections in the future, and hope that readers will take the opportunity to do things like ask questions like this one.

To answer, it, yes, we were working with a build of which is after 10.5.6 but isn&#039;t fully integrated into the 10.5.7 build tree either. From what we hear, a significant part of 10.5.7 will be drivers, hardware support and processor/platform optimizations centered around Nehalem -- remember, Core i7 starts on the desktop but will also reach into the laptop space soon as well with dual and even quad-core, single-chip designs that also sport the triple-channel, DDR3-1066 based architecture which makes Core i7 so powerful.

We&#039;re playing with a &quot;late alpha&quot; quality build of Snow Leopard (10.6) and although it will be a few more days before we get more hands-on time with that silver-and-black Nehalem beast of a Mac Pro prototype, we&#039;re hoping to bring the two together as soon as possible to do comparative benchmarks. Precise numbers will probably get embargoed until closer to the announcement date (roughly six weeks out, if memory serves, though that could shift either way depending on cost and availability ramping curves from Intel), but stopwatch/ballpark results ought to be available in a week or two at the outside with any luck.

In short.....yes, we are working with what is basically 10.5.6 plus a basic set of Nehalem optimizations. Grand Central, which is at the heart of Snow Leopard, does a far better job we&#039;re told and comes pretty close, even in its present form, to the most optimized system in existence for Core i7 according to sources at Intel and Infinite Loop. So we would expect considerable improvements indeed out of 10.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, Chark! We hope to be far more active in these moderated comments sections in the future, and hope that readers will take the opportunity to do things like ask questions like this one.</p>
<p>To answer, it, yes, we were working with a build of which is after 10.5.6 but isn&#8217;t fully integrated into the 10.5.7 build tree either. From what we hear, a significant part of 10.5.7 will be drivers, hardware support and processor/platform optimizations centered around Nehalem &#8212; remember, Core i7 starts on the desktop but will also reach into the laptop space soon as well with dual and even quad-core, single-chip designs that also sport the triple-channel, DDR3-1066 based architecture which makes Core i7 so powerful.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re playing with a &#8220;late alpha&#8221; quality build of Snow Leopard (10.6) and although it will be a few more days before we get more hands-on time with that silver-and-black Nehalem beast of a Mac Pro prototype, we&#8217;re hoping to bring the two together as soon as possible to do comparative benchmarks. Precise numbers will probably get embargoed until closer to the announcement date (roughly six weeks out, if memory serves, though that could shift either way depending on cost and availability ramping curves from Intel), but stopwatch/ballpark results ought to be available in a week or two at the outside with any luck.</p>
<p>In short&#8230;..yes, we are working with what is basically 10.5.6 plus a basic set of Nehalem optimizations. Grand Central, which is at the heart of Snow Leopard, does a far better job we&#8217;re told and comes pretty close, even in its present form, to the most optimized system in existence for Core i7 according to sources at Intel and Infinite Loop. So we would expect considerable improvements indeed out of 10.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

